A Randomized
One-Year Back Pain Trial Utilizing an Email List
Kate Lorig,
Diana Laurent, Philip Ritter, Stanford University
The objective was to determine the effectiveness of a moderated
Internet discussion group with supporting materials in improving
health status and health care utilization. Subjects were randomized
to an email list where all members received the posts of all
other members, or a control group that received a magazine
subscription. Recruitment included, 1) reaching the study web
page, 2) completing a questionnaire to determine eligibility,
3) reading and submitting an informed consent
and 4) completing a baseline questionnaire. All activities
occurred online. The subjects were from 49 states, 62% male,
mean age 45.3 years (SD=11.6) and mean education 16.6 (SD=2.8)
years. During the 1-year study there were approximately 2500
posts with 68% of the subjects posting at least once.
At one year 190 (69%) treatment subjects compared to 232 (89%)
control subjects demonstrated less disability, health distress,
and interference in their daily activities; increased self-efficacy
to manage their symptoms, and increased orientation toward
self-care (all p<.01). There was a trend toward fewer back
related MD visits (p=.07). Results suggest that a moderated
email discussion group can have effects on health status and
may reduce health care utilization. These effects are in addition
to those received from traditional medical care.
Learning Objectives:
- Identify the outcomes of a randomized
Internet based back pain study
- Identify two major problems
encountered during the study.
- The most successful means of
recruiting study participants.
|